8? October 1874 (unrecovered)
To William Dean Howells • Hartford, Conn. (St. Louis Republican, 6 Oct 74)
Olympic Theatre.
Of course the St. Louis people were quite
 ready for Samson, and our present floating pop-
 ulation were equally eager to see
               a sturdy bib-
 lical character step down from the pedestal of
 sacred history upon the boards of the modern
 stage. He did
               it gracefully last night at the
 Olympic, and doing it he stirred up fresh inter-
 est in the sacred story itself. Perhaps
               there
 were those in the theatre who expected to see
 Samson make mince-meat of a lion, and wield
 the histrionic jaw-bone.
               They were disappoint-
 ed, but they saw something far better and more
 attractive. They saw a sublime and very
 effective
               drama most admirably performed.
 They saw one of our own actors—heretofore
 highly esteemed—make a noble
               advance in his
 profession, and give his name to a powerful per-
 formance, which will make it heard hereafter.
 Doubtless
               some of the Olympic audience saw the
 great Salvini play Samson, but that was in Ital-
 ian, and the performance was little
               more than
 pantomime set to gibberish.1explanatory note Last night they
 saw an English Samson, and they absorbed the
 whole story in presence of the embodiment.
 Words
               throw a great light upon acting, and
 these words by Mr. Howells are perfectly at-
 tuned to the spirit of the old story. They
               are
 strong Saxon words, used in the right
 places upon a fine theme, and the
 result is poetry. The Italian play has
               been
 translated into dramatic blank verse, which
 bends and sways grandly with the storm of the
 action, and sings like
               the wind through stately
 cedars. We commend this English version of
 the Italian play as classical, lofty and essen-
               tially dramatic. We don’t think a word could
 be struck or changed to better it. So much for
 the literary character
               of the drama.
Many of our citizeds  imagine they have seen
 Mr. Charles Pope act, but however well he may
 have done heretofore he never acted so well
               as
 he did last night. He seemed almost to put his
 old self away as something for which he had no
 further use, and build
               himself up anew in a sin-
 gle night. His brain and body were filled with
 Samson and he gave us the outlines of a new and
               magnificent stage picture, which is
 worthy of his most earnest labor
 to finish. It is not yet perfect,
 it could not be
               at a first performance in any
 hands, but the drawing is grand and true; and
 Mr. Pope, as an artist, possesses the means
               to
 its perfection. It requires only shading and
 toning. The colors are all there, warm with
 light and life and soul.
Mr. Pope, by his commanding figure and mus-
 cular movement, filled the idea of Samson to
 begin with, and, if we may
               say
 so, looked the part. It was
 the poetry of muscle that children have in their
 mind’s eye when reading of
               the giants of the
 old days. It was the artistic Samson of the play
 too, as well as of the Bible. His story of the
               lion-slaying in the first act was really a magnifi-
 cent piece of pantomime and speech-description
 and aroused the house. His
               defiance of the
 Philistines in the second act rose to grandeur,
 and he was called before the
 curtain by the storm in
               the
 auditorium. That stamped the play as a great
 success beyond a doubt. The feat of carrying
 off old Manoah was
               handsomely done. The
 love-making of Samson and Delilah in the third
 act was a little crude. It lacked fervor
 and
               spontaneity. It showed care and study, but
 there was too much effort apparent and it
 lacked ease. There was not enough
               detail to give it the glow of passion.
 Mr. Pope was also called out at the end of this
 act, which, in some measure, destroyed
               the
 illusion of his sleep from the effects of wine at
 Delilah’s hands. Samson’s awakening in the
               fourth act and his curse of Delilah, were among
 the finest points of the play; and Delilah’s woe
 over the
               captivity and terrible doom of Samson
 was powerfully done. Miss Lillie2explanatory note sur-
 passed herself in this scene and got
 an enthusiastic call. The last act and fall of
 the temple of Dagon
               worked well both in act-
 ing and machinery. Samson’s feeling of his
 returning strength, and his exemplification
               of
 it by breaking his chains was capital, and made
 an electric point which told on the sympathies
 of the audience. His
               language and business
 before pulling down the pillars were a little
 tardy. This fault was, however, quite slight.
Mr. Pope was called out at the end of the
 play and made a brief and very appropriate ac-
 knowledgment of thanks on account
               of the
 author and for himself, and a call at the end of
 a play, it must be borne in mind, is very unu-
 sual here. There
               is no kind of doubt that
 “Samson” made a deep impression upon all
 and was a great surprise to many. It
               was ad-
 mirably put on the stage and extremely
 well played throughout. Every one of the actors
 was perfect in the words
               and there was no hitch
 or delay, except in the preparation of the last
 set, which is unavoidable. The scenery and
               furniture and costumes were all that they could
 be in beauty and completeness, and added their
 due measure to the general
               success of the per-
 formance. “Samson” will be repeated to-night.
Italian tragedian Tommaso Salvini (1829–1916) played the title role in Ippolito d’Aste’s Sansone during his American tour of 1873–74 (Odell, 9:380, 390–91, 400, 455–56).
Miss Lillie, otherwise unidentified, may have been the actress who regularly appeared in supporting roles on the New York stage (Odell, 9:40, 105, 384, 390; Howells 1960, 2).
  
“Amusements,” St. Louis Republican, 6 Oct 74, 9. Copy-text is a microfilm edition of the newspaper in the Library of Congress (DLC).
L6 , 627–30.