20 and 21 April 1880 • Hartford, Conn. (MS: NNC and NN-BGC, UCCL 01787 and 02541)
I started to write the enclosed to Chatto & Windus, but I saw I was too angry, & so it would be better for you to convey to them in inoffensive language that I am not in the publishing business, & that as long as you are in London & Bliss in Hartford I will have nothing whatever to do with electros, dates of issue, or any other matter of the sort. Jesus Christ, how mad I am! This man is forever ignoring Bliss & writing me about electros & matters strictly within Bliss’s province.
“Will I (not Conway, not Bliss, but will I put aside my own matters &) “kindly see that a complete set of the electros of the illustrations are immediately dispatched to us, etc.” Why should I give such a loose order for 300 plates, & be responsible for it? It is unbusiness-like & absurd. I will do nothing of the sort. I have enclosed Chatto’s letter to Bliss & told him to return it to me at once, to enclose to you. I have told him that if he chooses to consider Chatto’s order in the light of a business transaction, fire away & fill it—but not on my responsibility. He is merely the salaried servant of a Company, & it isn’t likely he will venture.
Well, it gravels me through & through, that Chatto waits from July ’79 to April ’80—8 or 9 months, without asking a solitary question about the book, & then pitches into me about the miscarriage.
Bliss’s address: American Publishing Co.,
284 Asylum st., Hartford, Conn.
P. S.—21st: I sent down for the letter & Frank Bliss answered in person, in place of his father—his father quite ill & not allowed to talk business. There was nothing for it, then, but for me to order Chatto’s electros for him & sign a paper making myself & estate responsible for the $450 if n Chatto dies or defaults. Fra
This is simply a hell of a way to do business.
OVER. Ⓐemendation
Chatto has not had time, yet, to get the elder Bliss’s letter; so he orders (or rather, gets me to order) more than 300 electros without any idea of what they will cost. I made Frank Bliss promise to cable to-day as follows:
“Chatto, Publisher, London. Electros making—price $450;”—so he would have a chance to cable & stop their manufacture if he wanted to.
Now I am done with this business—if Chatto wants to know how the electros are progressing, or anything else about them, he must write Bliss, & not me.
P. P. S.—I meant to enclose Chatto’s letter, but Frank Bliss wanted to keep it, & as as being in a kind of vague & spectral way an order for electros.
enclosure:
Mr. Conway is my business agent. Let us suppose that you desire to know several things, to-wit:
1. How many pages in the book?
2. Will it issue before Xmas ’79?
3. Will it issue before Apr. ’80?
4. When will it issue?
5. If, between Aug. 1st 1879 & March 1st 1880, we never ask a single question nor order a single electro, shall we be in a position to complain when we hear that the American edition is out without us?
6. How shall we proceed, & whom shall we address, in order to procure electros?
If Mr. Conway could not answer these questions on the spot, he would write to Mr. Bliss my publisher, & get the information.
I have nothing to do with publishing my books; & I won’t have anything to do with it, either here or in England. With Mr. Conway right at your elbow, you keep writing to me. When you want electros, you write me. I Ⓐemendation have no electros, & never have had any electros. Why do you not write Bliss, who has electros? When things go wrong, you complain to me. My dear Sirs, through Mr. Conway I send you advance-sheets (looking to it myself & seeing that it is done) for a royalty——it is all I have ever agreed to do—it is all that I have ever had the slightest intention of making myself responsible for.
enclosure,simulated line by line:
MARK TWAIN’S NEW BOOK.1explanatory note
In the natural disgust of a creative 
mind for the following that vulgarizes
                  
and cheapens its work, Mr. Tennyson 
spoke in parable concerning his verse:
But this bad effect is to the final loss 
of the rash critic rather than the poet, 
who necessarily survives
                  imitation, and 
appeals to posterity as singly as if no- 
body had tried to ape him; while those 
who rejected him, along
                  with his copy- 
ists, have meantime thrown away a great 
pleasure. Just at present some of us 
are in danger of doing
                  ourselves a like 
damage. “Thieves from over the wall” 
have got the seed of a certain drollery,
                  
which sprouts and flourishes plentifully 
in every newspaper, until the thought 
of American Humor is becoming terri-
                  
ble; and sober-minded people are be- 
ginning to have serious question whether 
we are not in danger of degenerating
                  
into a nation of wits. But we ought to 
take courage from observing, as we may, 
that this plentiful crop of humor is not
                  
racy of the original soil; that in short 
the thieves from over the wall were not 
also able to steal Mr.
                  Clemens’s garden 
plot. His humor springs from a certain 
intensity of common sense, a passionate 
love of
                  justice, and a generous scorn of 
what is petty and mean; and it is these 
qualities which his “school”
                  have not 
been able to convey. They have never 
been more conspicuous than in this last 
book of his, to which they may be
                  said to 
give its sole coherence. It may be claim- 
ing more than a humorist could wish to 
assert that he is always in
                  earnest; but 
this strikes us as the paradoxical charm 
of Mr. Clemens’s best humor. Its wild- 
est
                  extravagance is the break and fling 
from a deep feeling, a wrath with some 
folly which disquiets him worse than 
other
                  men, a personal hatred for some 
humbug or pretension that embitters 
him beyond anything but laughter. It 
must be
                  because he is intolerably weary 
of the twaddle of pedestrianizing that he 
conceives the notion of a tramp through
                  
Europe, which he operates by means of 
express trains, steamboats, and private 
carriages, with the help of an agent and
                  
a courier; it is because he has a real 
loathing, otherwise inexpressible, for 
Alp-climbing, that he imagines an ascent
                  
of the Riffelberg, with “half a mile of 
men and mules” tied together by rope. 
One sees that
                  affectations do not first 
strike him as ludicrous, merely, but as 
detestable. He laughs, certainly, at an 
abuse, at ill
                  manners, at conceit, at cruel- 
ty, and you must laugh with him; but 
if you enter into the very spirit of his 
humor, you
                  feel that if he could set these 
things right there would be very little 
laughing. At the bottom of his heart 
he has
                  often the grimness of a reformer; 
his wit is turned by preference not upon 
human nature, not upon droll situations 
and
                  things abstractly ludicrous, but upon 
matters that are out of joint, that are 
unfair or unnecessarily ignoble, and cry
                  
out to his love of justice for discipline. 
Much of the fun is at his own cost where 
he boldly attempts to grapple with
                  some 
hoary abuse, and gets worsted by it, as 
in his verbal contest with the girl at the 
medicinal springs in Baden, who
                  returns 
“that beggar’s answer” of half Europe, 
“What you please,” to
                  his ten-times- 
repeated demand of “How much?” and 
gets the last word. But it is plain that 
if he
                  had his way there would be a fixed 
price for those waters very suddenly, 
and without regard to the public amuse- 
ment,
                  or regret for lost opportunities of 
humorous writing.
It is not Mr. Clemens’s business in 
Europe to find fault, or to contrast 
things there with
                  things here, to the per- 
petual disadvantage of that continent; 
but sometimes he lets homesickness and 
his disillusion
                  speak. This book has not 
the fresh frolicsomeness of the Innocents 
Abroad; it is Europe revisited, and seen 
through
                  eyes saddened by much experi- 
ence of tables d’hôte, old masters, and 
traveling
                  Americans,—whom, by the 
way, Mr. Clemens advises not to travel 
too long at a time in Europe, lest they 
lose
                  national feeling and become traveled 
Americans. Nevertheless, if we have 
been saying anything about the book, or 
about
                  the sources of Mr. Clemens’s hu- 
mor, to lead the reader to suppose that 
it is not immensely amusing, we have
                  
done it a great wrong. It is delicious, 
whether you open it at the sojourn in 
Heidelberg, or the voyage down the
                  
Neckar on a raft, or the mountaineering 
in Switzerland, or the excursion beyond 
Alps into Italy. The method is that
                  
discursive method which Mark Twain 
has led us to expect of him. The story 
of a man who had a claim against the
                  
United States government is not imper- 
tinent to the bridge across the river 
Reuss; the remembered tricks played
                  
upon a printer’s devil in Missouri are 
the natural concomitants of a walk to 
Oppenau. The writer has always
                  the 
unexpected at his command, in small 
things as well as great: the story of the 
raft journey on the Neckar is full of
                  
these surprises; it is wholly charming. 
If there is too much of anything, it is 
that ponderous and multitudinous ascent
                  
of the Riffelberg; there is probably too 
much of that, and we would rather have 
another appendix in its place. The ap-
                  
pendices are all admirable; especially 
those on the German language and the 
German newspapers, which get no more
                  
sarcasm than they deserve. 
One should not rely upon all state- 
ments of the narrative, but its spirit is 
the truth, and it
                  honestly breathes Amer- 
ican travel in Europe as a large minority 
of our forty millions know it. The ma- 
terial is
                  inexhaustible in the mere Amer- 
icans themselves, and they are rightful 
prey. Their effect upon Mr. Clemens 
has been to
                  make him like them best at 
home; and no doubt most of them will 
agree with him that “to be condemned 
to live
                  as the average European family 
lives would make life a pretty heavy 
burden to the average American fam-
                  
ily.” This is the sober conclusion which 
he reaches at last, and it is unquestion- 
able, like the vastly
                  greater part of the 
conclusions at which he arrives through- 
out. His opinions are no longer the 
opinions of the
                  Western American newly 
amused and disgusted at the European 
difference, but the Western American’s
                  
impressions on being a second time con- 
fronted with things he has had time to 
think over. This is the serious under-
                  
current of the book, to which we find 
ourselves reverting from its obvious com- 
icality. We have, indeed, so great an
                  
interest in Mr. Clemens’s likes and dis- 
likes, and so great respect for his pref- 
erences generally, that
                  we are loath to 
let the book go to our readers without 
again wishing them to share these feel- 
ings. There is no danger
                  that they will 
not laugh enough over it; that is an 
affair which will take care of itself; but 
there is a possibility
                  that they may not 
think enough over it. Every account 
of European travel, or European life, 
by a writer who is worth
                  reading for 
any reason, is something for our reflec- 
tion and possible instruction; and in this 
delightful work of a
                  man of most orig- 
inal and characteristic genius “the av- 
erage American” will find much to en-
                  
lighten as well as amuse him, much to 
comfort and stay him in such Ameri- 
canism as is worth having, and nothing
                  
to flatter him in a mistaken national 
vanity or a stupid national prejudice.
 
  
The bulk of the letter to Conway (1.1–23, “Hartford . . . Conn.”), is MS, Conway Papers, NNC; the postscripts to Conway and the letter to Chatto and Windus (1.24– 2.43, “P. S.— . . . Mark.”) are MS, NN-BGC. The enclosure is transcribed from a copy of the Atlantic Monthly in CU-MARK.
AAA/Anderson Galleries, 13–14 November 1935, no. 4201, lot 668, partial publication; MTLP , 122–24, partial publication; MicroPUL, reel 1.