3 September 1881 • Elmira, N.Y. (MS: MH-H, UCCL 02023)
Private
What I call my mind, has been in a state of fierce & uncontrollable irruption, during three successive days. The consequence is, I am on◊ my back, burnt out, devastated, & merely smouldering. At your house (I think it was) an old idea came again into my head which I had missed from that treasury during seven or eight years or more: the idea that of adding a character to Shakspeare’s Hamlet. I did the thing once—nine years ago; the addition was a country cousin of Hamlet’s. But it did not suit me, & I burnt it. A cousin wouldn’t answer; the family could not consistently ignore him; one couldn’t rationally explain a his a cousin’s standing around the stage during 5 acts & never being spoken to: yet of course the added character must not be spoken to; for the sacrilegious scribbler who ventured to put words into Shakspeare’s mouth would probably be hanged. But I’ve got a character, now, who is all right. He goes & comes as he pleases; yet he does not need to be spoken to. I’ve done the first & second Acts; but this was too much work for three days; so I am in bed. But I am in bed really as a precaution, only; it is to guard against wandering up to the study; I should go to work, sure—& I have had some rough lessons in the matter of over-workⒶemendation.
I say “private” up there, because I would not like my secret to go out of the family till my work is done—& you know I generally drop my work in the middle & then take it up again next year. I am doing this thing for the enjoyment I get out of it; therefore there is no hurry. Shall return to “Etiquette” presently.
Your experience in the matter of “Dr. Breen” & the authoress of its Doppelganger, adds a rattling strong instance to my list of cases of “mental telegraphing.” I guess that by the time that that magazine article is finished, it will make curious & interesting reading. Seems to me there were other cases mentioned when yours was spoken of. Why the nation did I let them slip out of my mind?
Take it all around, it was a pretty fat visit that I made to Boston & Belmont. Among other things, that visit cast in my way an idea toward perfecting an invention of mine; & it gave me the right character for my Hamllet et; the incident for my “mental telegraphy;” chapter on international etiquette; mighty nice dog; a staving good time at your house & Fairchild’s—yes, & the great day of mourning, in Boston, that memorable Friday, when one could almost feel the heart of the nation beat.
But I might as well be at work as writing 600 words & calling it recreation—wherefore, good bye, & mind you keep Winnie right where she is—it is the sure remedy. I am her fellow-rest-curist, to-day.
References
- Harvard University, Houghton Library, Cambridge, Mass.
- Machlis, Paul, ed. Union Catalog of Clemens Letters. Edited by Paul Machlis. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. [In some cases, UCCL catalog numbers cited in this volume supersede those assigned in 1986 and reflect corrections or additions to the catalog since publication. An updated version of the catalog can be consulted via the Letters Search page at MTPO.] 1986
- MTHL. Mark Twain–Howells Letters. Edited by Henry Nash Smith and William M. Gibson, with the assistance of Frederick Anderson. 2 vols. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1960
MS, MH-H (shelf mark bMS Am 1784 [98], 92).
MTHL, 1:369–70.
See Howells Letters in Description of Provenanceclick to open link.